THANKS!!

user and password are blacklisted now...

User/Pass works for the AV only version, not for the Smart Security version. Please post a Smart Security working User/Pass

What is diference between comercial and business editions ?

Nothing... just the interface logo where is says BUSINESS EDITION

Here are the Home Editions one on rs com:
tubeurl.com/4585/

Just Google for nodlogin8a, grab it and your ready to go!

What about NOD32 SMART SECURITY BUSINESS EDITION ?
Where's the link ?

There's no current working crack for any version.

No point downloading unless you want to try it out.

CAN ANYONE POST A KEYGEN/SERIAL FOR MCAFEE SITE ADVISOR PLUS

Man, My Mirror tab has disapeared. Anyone have the same problem?

Working Keys

Username: AV-7102573
Password: yts7gbo4d5

Username: EAV-00162951
Password: 7pcrepwtv3

UserName: EAV-00164457
Password: vapdre2js4

Username: EAV-00310344
Password: jskb4kr5eh

Username: EAV-00634343
Password: km6dmt6tja

Username: EAV-00310372
Password: pej7e8ede2

Username: EAV-00164163
Password: v5k2dvuvnp

Username: EAV-00310861
Password: us8hewjedt

Username: EAV-00310894
Password: ef7pa4ambs

Username: AV-7085239
Password: vv1w67ax1c

Username: AV-7083894
Password: wrhbpt1oic

all keys post above has been blacklisted!

sorry,this one is working for antivirus :UserName: AV-7086153
Password: 5ca2d9x1fw

if you google foa an app called nodlogin8.0a, that works but you must uninstall any other crack 1st for it to work

I've had these new versions working like a dream from day one :)

Anyone has the ESET Smart Security v3.0.566 Business Edition? Please post it here...

Cnt download any1 know oder solution?

Its great that keys are put up site but you don't think ESET watches these sites and immediatley blacklists the number. Thet are not stupid

True, their not stupid... so, NO, they don't watch this site cause they don't need to!

Every time a key is used to download updates, Eset's servers log the IP and the key for each request. So when they process the logs of the web servers they blacklist only the keys that have been used from more IP's than usual. That's why some keys remain valid longer while others die quickly, some get less used while others, the ones at the ends of the lists, are used excessively.

yup you got point ryt der

Please post a Eset Smart Security 3.0.566 X64 Business Edition :(

THANKS!!THIS Password AND
Username NOT VORKING

Mirror was not enabled until I added my nod32.lic file. Same as home edition. Still testing, but it looks like mirror on v3 and v2 are not compatible either. There is no option that I have found like in v2 to pull down other version clients. When you try to update off a mirror created by either the remote server mirrro or the client mirror with v2, it hangs on the update.ver file.
I ran a check on the install files inside the msi, comparing both versions (home and business). They are identical except for a resource dll. eguiProduct.dll This is probably the gui that says business edition instead of home edition. That is the only difference I can find between the two editions...
Reply With Quote

Yo!!!

NOD32King...

You were wondering where uagas postings went?

Well uagadugu is a retard. And I dont mean that as an insult, I really mean "retarded", little bus to school, parents used a leash, wears a helmet 24/7. So his postings are just copies of other peoples postings that he gets a freind or family member to reword slightly to say what he really wants it to but cant because....hes retarded. So 9down will not ban him because hes special they just remove his jibberish after a day or two.

the rating says it all!!

Does anybody have ESET Smart Security for Win XP/2000/Vista (32-bit) v.3.0.566 Business Edition??? PLEASE POST IT...

Does anybody have ESET Smart Security for Win XP/2000/Vista (32-bit) v.3.0.566 Business Edition??? PLEASE POST IT...

What "link about the comments"? To download from ESET you need a username and a password... I mean to download BUSINESS EDITION!

what a shit load of crap!!

Good luck for all member that finished download Eset Smarty Security Business Edition 3.0.566 before Admin delete it one minute ago

It's the same crap as Home Edition so there is no point in wasting time finding a download link for it!

check your inbox Mavet but I dont know if Admin delete it soon too...Good Luck

I never lie man except in hard pressure hi..hi..hi

UserName: EAV-00634146
PassWord: mwaebv82u2

UserName: AV-7075106
PassWord: 2oqd22et65

Checked update at 2007-11-29 3:43AM
Version of virus signature database: 2692 (20071128)

With me i use KAVWS + NOD32 = King Safe = King Slow pc .... ^_^

Does anyone know where to get a nod32.lic file ?

the best anti-virus!!

Thanks DSEO

TOTAL CRAP!!!

"NODCRAP MORE CRAP THAN EVER!"

Well, I have no reason to openly support any software company, but to call NOD32 "crap" based on one test seems ridiculous and premature to me. I'm sure that NOD32 supporters will find a hundred of other tests showing how great it is. I've seen tests where it came no. 1, 2 and 3. Tests don't prove a jack $hit. Only a fool buys any of that. I base my conclusions on personal experience. What does that mean? Well, I've been using NOD32 for the past 5 years and never, not once, ever, had a problem whatsoever. Still "crap," eh? Hm, I don't think so.

"RATING SAYS IT ALL ? "
YES ,IT SAYS WHO PAID MORE MONEY GOT A BETTER PLACE !!! BELIEVE IT ! THAT`S THE WAY THINGS ARE DONE.

Dont go to hard on uagadugu. He just got out of prison. Been there for the last year. He went there a moron and came back somebodys ***.

Disregard his drivel. NOD32 is now and always has been the proven best.

thanks for the link `thrylos7
nod32 working great

u know why Bitdefender(Romania), Kaspershit(Russia), ESET(Ukraine) etc all make good antivirus?

cuz those commie cocksuckers are the ones writing the viruses!

does anyone know where to get a nod32.lic file

Who Says Kaspersky the best?

LOOK At Those Change LOGS

Changes in 7.0.1.289 Beta: Currently Unknown

* Changes in 7.0.1.262 Beta:15244 AH: incorrect counter for recieved traffic
* 30664 Errors counting outbound traffic interception
* 29887 ODS: Button "neutralize all" choses an action "Skip"
* 30745 Help: the description for white/black lists wording is not correct
* 30905 Massive Traffic
* 30932 Consistent crashing of build 261
* 30933 BSOD: On Vista x64 bit, ntoskrnl.exe constantly crashes

* Changes in 7.0.1.254 Beta:23683 Changing profile to the same one causes an incorrect balloon to appear.
* 25117 Formating problems in "Details" link in the Firewall alerts on Vista
* 29369 FireWall: alert belloons are constantly appearing in a loop
* 30326 When installing Anti-Spam avp.exe has problems stopping
* 30436 Anti-Banner: When adding mutiple objects from the Report tab only one is added
* 30443 Vista64: 251 loads up CPU for 99%, and does not respond to queries
* 30449 PDM: The alert does not appear again when suspicious activity is executed again
* 30546 Traffic Control: Impossible to change/add description with changing the port number
* 30562 fr: Anti-Spam tab window is all messed up

* Changes in 7.0.1.252 Beta:24884 Show the time of the product expiration
* 24890 Extra dot in the messages about impossibility to add a key
* 25145 Negative counter on the reports of "Good Mail"
* 29720 Firewall: alert about an application excutable being changed
* 29887 ODS: Option "Neutralize All" selects "Skip" action
* 30099 Firewall: scanning tcp ports using ipv6 is detected as "Land" attack
* 30166 AntiSpam: broken training on outgoing emails durng PIW.
* 30170 AntiSpam: Not training during PIW on pop3 accounts for Outlook
* 30171 AntiSpam: training via PIW "white" addresses are not automatically added
* 30241 Cannot move spam in specified folder
* 30244 Mailwasher - problems connecting with server
* 30280 Connecting to http resource in ipv6 domain causes an Attack message to appear
* 30288 Broken button "Add to Anti-Banner" in 64? IE
* 30289 Vista64, Build_246: program crashed before/after the wizard
* 30356 Intercept file operations for applications which were added to Trusted Zone
* 30368 AntiSpam: Sometimes not proper import from clients towards Address White Lists
* 30406 AntiSpam: In ?? rules are not being created
* 30407 BSOD during updates
* 30423 "Stop" button is locked out in the main window
* 30424 AntiSpam: Empty checkbox in the window of Address Book import
* 30427 Program crashes when trying to update on Vista, Windows XP
* 30455 OAS: extracted eicar is not being detected

* Changes in 7.0.0.124:An error that could cause a BSOD in some cases of interception of driver calls to system registry has been fixed.

* Changes in 7.0.0.123:Improved: Error that caused application crash when scanning startup objects with corrupted registry has been fixed.
* Improved: KLV07-07.Klif.sys calling NtOpenProcess vulnerability» has been fixed.
* Known Issue: Under certain conditions advanced mode disinfection may leave registry links to deleted infected files.
* Known Issue: Under Microsoft Windows Vista the installation program may freeze if there is an established VPN connection. To resolve the issue, we recommend that the VPN connection be broken prior to application install.
* Known Issue: With SSL scans enabled, there might be issues communicating with certain sites which require verification of a client certificate. To resolve the issue it is recommended that encrypted traffic from certain necessary applications be added to the exclusions.
* Known Issue: When updating Microsoft WindowsXPto Microsoft Windows Vista,the application has to be removed prior to the start of the update procedure and reinstalled following the update.
* Known Issue: When updating to a higher version of Microsoft Windows Vista (for example, from Home Basic to Ultimate), the application restore procedure must be performed.
* Known Issue: Writing the rescue disk to a DVD is not supported.
* Known Issue: There are compatibility problems with HTTP tunneling. Temporarily disable Web Anti-Virus to resolve.

* Changes in 7.0.0.117:Improved: Application graphical user interface has been updated.
* Improved: New heuristic analyzer has been added to detect unknown threats.
* Improved: Quick install option with default settings has been added.
* Improved: Security Wizard has been added for quick troubleshooting of issues with settings and runtime problems.
* Improved: News delivery from Kaspersky Lab has been implemented using a new News Agent module.
* Improved: New generation keylogger detection mechanism has been added to Proactive Defense.
* Improved: Protection from new types of leak tests has been added.
* Improved: Extended new generation rootkit scan capability has been implemented.
* Known Issue: Under certain conditions advanced mode disinfection may leave registry links to deleted infected files.
* Known Issue: Under Microsoft Windows Vista the installation program may freeze if there is an established VPN connection. To resolve the issue, we recommend that the VPN connection be broken prior to application install.
* Known Issue: With SSL scans enabled, there might be issues communicating with certain sites which require verification of a client certificate. To resolve the issue it is recommended that encrypted traffic from certain necessary applications be added to the exclusions.
* Known Issue: When updating Microsoft WindowsXPto Microsoft Windows Vista,the application has to be removed prior to the start of the update procedure and reinstalled following the update.
* Known Issue: When updating to a higher version of Microsoft Windows Vista (for example, from Home Basic to Ultimate), the application restore procedure must be performed.
* Known Issue: Writing the rescue disk to a DVD is not supported.
* Known Issue: There are compatibility problems with HTTP tunneling. Temporarily disable Web Anti-Virus to resolve.


How May Bugs? BSOD? Unstability? Problems? Betas?

3 years i'm Using NOD32 None of like those popping Out from My PC

I Didn't says NOD is the best BUT IT'S A LOT BETTER THAN KASPERSKY

Damn belloons! :)

Lookie THERE

KASPERSKY MANIAC

USE 9down Search

USE KEYWORD "KASPERSKY"

Count How MAny Betas REsult YOU FOUND

THEN POST IT HERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LICENSE [url=http://img106.imageshack.us/my.php?image=nodlicensexi9.jpg][img=http://img106.imageshack.us/img106/4241/nodlicensexi9.th.jpg][/url]

Goodbye nodCRAP; Hello Kaspersky!!!

Published July 12th, 2007 in Corporate Talk

"Eset's nodCRAP has long been our favorite anti-virus program at NeoSmart Technologies.
In recent years (mainly from last year though), nodCRAP has fallen WAY BEHIND in the detection rankings, but for the most part had remained a decent choice. Virus.gr has the latest testing results as summed up in this post at CyberNet News. In the latest round of tests (and the one before that, and the one before that) Kaspersky is yet again at the top, with a 99.23% detection rate for the newly-released version 7 and a 99.13% for version 6...

..But all changed with the release of Kaspersky 7. In a test run, we found 3 different trojans on our machines (for a total of 6 infected files) that nodCRAP hadn't detected (even with heuristics enabled and set to the highest level) which Kaspersky picked up immediately..

..The real kicker wasn't the fact that nodCRAP missed a trojan, it was the fact that 2 of these trojans have been listed in the Kaspersky virus signature database since mid-2006, and that when reporting such missed trojans the nodCRAP team replies in a mostly arrogant manner.
Looking at this thread where a nodCRAP user reported to their tech support that several common trojans ((One of which was found in our test run here at NeoSmart Technologies)) weren't picked up by nodCRAP but were by Kasperksy, the replies by nodCRAP moderators are quite shocking. They start off by claiming that the original poster's title is misleading purposely accusatory (which it isn't, objectively speaking) and this later escalates (when a new poster claims to have a list of 21 trojans nodCRAP failed to detect) into accusations of virus-harvesting and purposely looking for nodCRAP's weaknesses..

..What should have been a simple "thank you for your observations and our apologies for the inconvenience" became a highly-ridiculous "nodCRAP can do no wrong" thread. We've been recommending nodCRAP since the start, but to us it is clear that this is where we part paths. If a company makes a mistake an oversight of a single trojan, that we can live with. But when moderators on their forum insist on turning it into a personal attack against anyone that has any issues with nodCRAP, it's sign that something very wrong is underfoot.
So, goodbye nodCRAP, you've served us average throughout the years (as previous threads and articles will testify). But it's time for a new AV that continues to improve and without taking offense to simple mistakes. Unfortunately, pride and failure often to lead to one and the same thing - and if there's a better alternative, we'd be fools not to take it."
-neosmart.net-

KASPERSKY IS KING

 

See this Image man, only NOD32 + ca can detect it as probably as a warning about a danger files/virus but Kaspersky is NOTHING FOUND coz sleeping too much, If you want this files, I will send you with all your own risk hi..hi..hii, NOD32 is the best

 

http://i12.tinypic.com/6tun95j.png

NOD32's heuristic capabilities dwarf those of its competition.

That's an unpacking tool for the Yoda PE packer! Not a very good comparison...

Most NOD32 User are like this stevenvigh; you can see he has no idea what he is talking about and is just a retard.

"RATING SAYS IT ALL" ???
uagadugu,

U FAILED UR MATH TEST OR U JUST DON'T KNOW HOW TO COUNT? IT JUST "NUMBER 6" NOT NUMBER 1 U KNOW!!! U JUST IGNORE THE TOP 5 AND SAID NUMBER 6 IS KING SO WAT IS NO 1 - 5 TO U!!!

BAKA!!!

kaspersky is the kING ?

I didn't think so!

How abotu a QX6950 With 4 GB of ram HANG ?

Cause of KasperskY?

CHECKED THE AV-TEST.ORG

GIVE ME THE RESULT LINK!

WHERE IS IT?

People...People...

When dealing with the likes of the uagadugu you must realise that he does not deal in reality.

The best he can do is either copy peoples postings and paste them together.

Or he makes shit up from the ground up.

Since he got out of prison it looks to me as if his fragile hold on reality has slipped entierly and hes fallen into an abyss of sheer madness.

He obviously is posting straight out of his ass ans knows he cant back up anything he post. Ignore the pison. Hes not worth argueing with since he lives in a worls where everyone is a fairy. Or hobbit or who the fuk knows what that sicko has going on up there where a brain is supposed to be, but aint.

Eventually he will end up back in prison and we will not have to worry about unstable idiot like him any longer.

NOD32...only if you matter!!

AS*SH*OLES GOTTA LEARN SOMETIME -POOR DUMMY PERFECTDUMB- MUAHAHAHAHA

Goodbye nodCRAP; Hello Kaspersky!!!

Published July 12th, 2007 in Corporate Talk

"Eset's nodCRAP has long been our favorite anti-virus program at NeoSmart Technologies.
In recent years (mainly from last year though), nodCRAP has fallen WAY BEHIND in the detection rankings, but for the most part had remained a decent choice. Virus.gr has the latest testing results as summed up in this post at CyberNet News. In the latest round of tests (and the one before that, and the one before that) Kaspersky is yet again at the top, with a 99.23% detection rate for the newly-released version 7 and a 99.13% for version 6. But all changed with the release of Kaspersky 7. In a test run, we found 3 different trojans on our machines (for a total of 6 infected files) that nodCRAP hadn't detected (even with heuristics enabled and set to the highest level) which Kaspersky picked up immediately.
The real kicker wasn't the fact that nodCRAP missed a trojan, it was the fact that 2 of these trojans have been listed in the Kaspersky virus signature database since mid-2006, and that when reporting such missed trojans the nodCRAP team replies in a mostly arrogant manner.
Looking at this thread where a nodCRAP user reported to their tech support that several common trojans ((One of which was found in our test run here at NeoSmart Technologies)) weren't picked up by nodCRAP but were by Kasperksy, the replies by nodCRAP moderators are quite shocking. They start off by claiming that the original poster's title is misleading purposely accusatory (which it isn't, objectively speaking) and this later escalates (when a new poster claims to have a list of 21 trojans nodCRAP failed to detect) into accusations of virus-harvesting and purposely looking for nodCRAP's weaknesses.
What should have been a simple "thank you for your observations and our apologies for the inconvenience" became a highly-ridiculous "nodCRAP can do no wrong" thread. We've been recommending nodCRAP since the start, but to us it is clear that this is where we part paths. If a company makes a mistake an oversight of a single trojan, that we can live with. But when moderators on their forum insist on turning it into a personal attack against anyone that has any issues with nodCRAP, it's sign that something very wrong is underfoot.
So, goodbye nodCRAP, you've served us average throughout the years (as previous threads and articles will testify). But it's time for a new AV that continues to improve and without taking offense to simple mistakes. Unfortunately, pride and failure often to lead to one and the same thing - and if there's a better alternative, we'd be fools not to take it."
-neosmart.net-

KASPERSKY IS KING

@RYANADIASSHOLE:

WANNA LINK? IT'S ON PCWELT PAGES, NOT ON AV-TEST.ORG- WEBLINKS BANNED BY 9DOWN HERE SO SEARCH IT FOR YOURSELF U FAGGOT OR GIMME UR DIRTY MAIL ADDRESS AND CONVINCE FOR URSELF ONCE FOR ALL HEHEH

BYE RETARDED

The behavior of Kaspersky is an advantage for mentally impaired such as uagadugu.
Since they release 3 betas PER WEEK as opposed to two or three per release like other developers who can code, there is like 50 different threads to watch instead of one like ESET.

HOW MANY OTHER DEVELOPERS HAVE TWO SIMULTANEOUS BETAS OF DIFFERENT VERSIONS OF THE SAME SOFTWARE??!

Windows XP Beta v5.12 with Windows Vista Beta v6.02, anyone?

Clearly, the coders at Kaspersky are incompetent.

NOD32.
When your data matters.

uagadugu,

just tell me wat is mean to u? "RATING SAYS IT ALL"??? why won't u use the NUMBER 1 instead of NUMBER 6? after all, like u said "RATING SAYS IT ALL"

most reliable?? i don't think so, this site is part of kaspershit.

BAKA!! BAKA!! IDOIT!! IDOIT!!

http://www.av-comparatives.org/seiten/ergebnisse_2007_11.php

The results are in and kaspershit got its ass handed to it by NOD32. 0 false positves and bettter detection. Kaspershit may as well hang it up now. What a failure. No wonder uagadugu is drawn to it so feverishly. He can relate to it(you to anti smart). Failures the whole lot of em.

NOD32 is truly the king!!!

Oh!

And this comparative website isn't made up. It really exsist. Unlike uagadugus bunch of bullshit.

YEAH KASPERSKY GOT ADVANCED+ ...WHAT ABOUT IT? IT'S ALREADY KNOWN THAT KASPERSKY IS KING -YOU RETARDED HAHAHAHA

WANNA REAL NEWS?
I'M REALLY GLAD TO GIVE YA ANOTHER EXCLUSIVE -KINDLY DEDICATED TO THE PAIR OF DUMBASSES CLOWNS: PERFECTDUMB & AXFLEMINASSHOLE:

Why Kaspersky IS Better Than nodCRAP - Here’s another reason!

By: Alexander Dimitru, Security Expert

"You can’t always tell which is the best anti-virus for your machine, as all the vendors will claim they deliver top-notch solutions, that they are leaders on the market and all that. Also, you often get facts stating that in some test a certain anti-virus ranked first, but they rarely state what competition they had. In any case, in view of recent events, Kaspersky beats the crap out of nodCRAP; and I will give you some facts and explain why it is so.

A computer with nodCRAP and Windows XP SP2 had been infected by several Trojans. The AV found two of them and no matter how many times you would delete them, they would still pop up after rebooting. nodCRAP could not disinfect the files, it just deleted them. That was pretty nasty. Couldn’t get rid of the threats! Cmd didn’t help much either – I guess they were stuck in the Recycler or something. Now, what I advised the owner of the affected machine was to run other AV solutions… however, none of the free ones seemed to do better than nodCRAP, fact which was to be expected. Then she asked me what else could she buy, so I advised her to get Kaspersky Internet Security 7.0. The minute it had been installed it asked for an update and a full system scan. It took Kaspersky about 2 hours to scan a 70% full 160GB hard drive, but it found 8 threats and eliminated them all. I then rebooted the machine and scanned the folders where the viruses had been discovered – now it was all clean. So, based on this experience, I would definitely go with Kaspersky, rather than nodCRAP.

To us users, it’s these things that count. It doesn’t matter what tests and magazines say – when you’re facing a threat and your AV doesn’t help you enough, then you deem it useless. Users don't care what other threats it may destroy – they want to get rid of the ones THEY'RE facing! Furthermore, after this happening, I definitely became a Kaspersky fan. I, for one, don’t care how much resource it will eat up – at least I will stay protected. What’s the use of having security software that will not "stress" your machine, if it’s also ineffective against viruses?"

KASPERSKY IS KING

ZZZ zzz ZZZ zzz ZZZ....

haha

I LOVE THE AV-COMPARATIVES.ORG

Says NOD 32 Advanced +
Kaspersky Advanced +

NOD 32 FALSE ALARM NONE
KASPERSKY FALSE ALARM "FEW" ( Didn't think so)

scanning speed nod32 FAST
KASPERSKY SLOW ? I think It's Fast

Kaspersky is nice i think bUt

I'll USE IT WHEN Cracked Keys Are Available haha

uagadugu thx for your advice

KASPERKY GOT 40 %
NOD32 GOT 71 %

Haha

I have used kaspersky on my OLD pc 'bout 1 year before the dumb Keyblacklisting haahaa

lookie here haha

but i think NOD32 and kaspersky are both better

USE THEM ALL, perfect combination!

YEAH! KAV 40%(HEURISTICS ONLY - ADVANCED+).....BUT WITH WAYYYYYYY BETTER DETECTION RATE....PROVEN! CHECK ON-DEMAND DETECTION, HERE'S WHERE UR nodCRAP GOT TRASHED! HAHAHAH

Why Kaspersky IS Better Than nodCRAP - Here’s another reason!

By: Alexander Dimitru, Security Expert

"You can’t always tell which is the best anti-virus for your machine, as all the vendors will claim they deliver top-notch solutions, that they are leaders on the market and all that. Also, you often get facts stating that in some test a certain anti-virus ranked first, but they rarely state what competition they had. In any case, in view of recent events, Kaspersky beats the crap out of nodCRAP; and I will give you some facts and explain why it is so.

A computer with nodCRAP and Windows XP SP2 had been infected by several Trojans. The AV found two of them and no matter how many times you would delete them, they would still pop up after rebooting. nodCRAP could not disinfect the files, it just deleted them. That was pretty nasty. Couldn’t get rid of the threats! Cmd didn’t help much either – I guess they were stuck in the Recycler or something. Now, what I advised the owner of the affected machine was to run other AV solutions… however, none of the free ones seemed to do better than nodCRAP, fact which was to be expected. Then she asked me what else could she buy, so I advised her to get Kaspersky Internet Security 7.0. The minute it had been installed it asked for an update and a full system scan. It took Kaspersky about 2 hours to scan a 70% full 160GB hard drive, but it found 8 threats and eliminated them all. I then rebooted the machine and scanned the folders where the viruses had been discovered – now it was all clean. So, based on this experience, I would definitely go with Kaspersky, rather than nodCRAP.

To us users, it’s these things that count. It doesn’t matter what tests and magazines say – when you’re facing a threat and your AV doesn’t help you enough, then you deem it useless. Users don't care what other threats it may destroy – they want to get rid of the ones THEY'RE facing! Furthermore, after this happening, I definitely became a Kaspersky fan. I, for one, don’t care how much resource it will eat up – at least I will stay protected. What’s the use of having security software that will not "stress" your machine, if it’s also ineffective against viruses?"

KASPERSKY IS KING

http://www.virusbtn.com/ is the best site for testing antivirus programs, also there you can see full test result for antivirus systems for 2007 year and the awards for the winning programs :
ESET, CAT QuickHeal, Symantec fully passed the tests. The requirements for VB100 (virus) certification are:

*

100% detection of malware listed as 'In the Wild' by the WildList Organization.
In order to display the VB100 logo, an anti-virus product must have demonstrated in our tests that:

* It detects all In the Wild viruses during both on-demand and on-access scanning.
* It generates no false positives when scanning a set of clean files.

The product must fulfil these critera in its default state. So... don't need to cheat each other, just use what you want and be patriot of this soft, or just use the best protection. All the software are updated very fast so we need only time to see next results for 2008 !!

The best way to fight against viruses: is to know the adress of these people who are creating them and to kick their asses!!!! hehe :))

AS*SH*OLES GOTTA LEARN SOMETIME...

Goodbye nodCRAP; Hello Kaspersky!!!

Published July 12th, 2007 in Corporate Talk

"Eset's nodCRAP has long been our favorite anti-virus program at NeoSmart Technologies.
In recent years (mainly from last year though), nodCRAP has fallen WAY BEHIND in the detection rankings, but for the most part had remained a decent choice. Virus.gr has the latest testing results as summed up in this post at CyberNet News. In the latest round of tests (and the one before that, and the one before that) Kaspersky is yet again at the top, with a 99.23% detection rate for the newly-released version 7 and a 99.13% for version 6. But all changed with the release of Kaspersky 7. In a test run, we found 3 different trojans on our machines (for a total of 6 infected files) that nodCRAP hadn't detected (even with heuristics enabled and set to the highest level) which Kaspersky picked up immediately.
The real kicker wasn't the fact that nodCRAP missed a trojan, it was the fact that 2 of these trojans have been listed in the Kaspersky virus signature database since mid-2006, and that when reporting such missed trojans the nodCRAP team replies in a mostly arrogant manner.
Looking at this thread where a nodCRAP user reported to their tech support that several common trojans ((One of which was found in our test run here at NeoSmart Technologies)) weren't picked up by nodCRAP but were by Kasperksy, the replies by nodCRAP moderators are quite shocking. They start off by claiming that the original poster's title is misleading purposely accusatory (which it isn't, objectively speaking) and this later escalates (when a new poster claims to have a list of 21 trojans nodCRAP failed to detect) into accusations of virus-harvesting and purposely looking for nodCRAP's weaknesses.
What should have been a simple "thank you for your observations and our apologies for the inconvenience" became a highly-ridiculous "nodCRAP can do no wrong" thread. We've been recommending nodCRAP since the start, but to us it is clear that this is where we part paths. If a company makes a mistake an oversight of a single trojan, that we can live with. But when moderators on their forum insist on turning it into a personal attack against anyone that has any issues with nodCRAP, it's sign that something very wrong is underfoot.
So, goodbye nodCRAP, you've served us average throughout the years (as previous threads and articles will testify). But it's time for a new AV that continues to improve and without taking offense to simple mistakes. Unfortunately, pride and failure often to lead to one and the same thing - and if there's a better alternative, we'd be fools not to take it."
-neosmart.net-

KASPERSKY IS KING

So what? what's the conclusion from the FULL article U SILLY FAGGOT??? ah?? I CAN'T HEAR YA MORON!!...well that's ok...Kaspersky is King


Why Kaspersky IS Better Than nodCRAP - Here’s another reason!

By: Alexander Dimitru, Security Expert

"You can’t always tell which is the best anti-virus for your machine, as all the vendors will claim they deliver top-notch solutions, that they are leaders on the market and all that. Also, you often get facts stating that in some test a certain anti-virus ranked first, but they rarely state what competition they had. In any case, in view of recent events, Kaspersky beats the crap out of nodCRAP; and I will give you some facts and explain why it is so.

A computer with nodCRAP and Windows XP SP2 had been infected by several Trojans. The AV found two of them and no matter how many times you would delete them, they would still pop up after rebooting. nodCRAP could not disinfect the files, it just deleted them. That was pretty nasty. Couldn’t get rid of the threats! Cmd didn’t help much either – I guess they were stuck in the Recycler or something. Now, what I advised the owner of the affected machine was to run other AV solutions… however, none of the free ones seemed to do better than nodCRAP, fact which was to be expected. Then she asked me what else could she buy, so I advised her to get Kaspersky Internet Security 7.0. The minute it had been installed it asked for an update and a full system scan. It took Kaspersky about 2 hours to scan a 70% full 160GB hard drive, but it found 8 threats and eliminated them all. I then rebooted the machine and scanned the folders where the viruses had been discovered – now it was all clean. So, based on this experience, I would definitely go with Kaspersky, rather than nodCRAP.

To us users, it’s these things that count. It doesn’t matter what tests and magazines say – when you’re facing a threat and your AV doesn’t help you enough, then you deem it useless. Users don't care what other threats it may destroy – they want to get rid of the ones THEY'RE facing! Furthermore, after this happening, I definitely became a Kaspersky fan. I, for one, don’t care how much resource it will eat up – at least I will stay protected. What’s the use of having security software that will not "stress" your machine, if it’s also ineffective against viruses?"

KASPERSKY IS KING

so, did anybody have working keys or keygen?

go to www.nod321.com for the daily key update

HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

 

Kaspershit just failed the December VB100 tests!!

 

That means that of the last five tests, Kaspershit failed twice!

And guess who is five for five??!

 

Stop being stupid, Kaspershit retards; trade up to the only King!

 

thanks for the heads-up, gigabyte89!

 

NOD32 IS KING!

HI ALL

i was reading your posts about this little fag war nod32 Vs kaspersky...welp.. i have to say uagadugu is realy dick! look like he is kaspersky undercoer in here hehe

for all off u ,listen to this...bothh are great proggies!! some shit kaspersky clean better than nod32 and some not...looking in all this queer test is good for big big org admin who has lots machine connect to the net doing lots varied shit. so by smart! take into consideration the most reliability crackable AV also or your pc will stay fag naked till new patch/crack will pop up

Cheers

Attention!
Kaspersky Anti-Virus has detected a virus in the file you have submitted.
Scanned file: ENOD32_AV.566.login8b.rar - Infected
-----------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------

ENOD32_AV.566.login8b.rar/ESET NOD32 AntiVirus 3.0.566/nodlogin readme.txt - OK
ENOD32_AV.566.login8b.rar/ESET NOD32 AntiVirus 3.0.566/setup.exe - infected by Trojan-Spy.Win32.Agent.asf

VIRUS DETECTED BY KASPERSKY -AS ALWAYS!!!-

KASPERSKY IS KING

Alright VB100 Test Kaspersky had failed

Time to Change To NOD32 hehe

Time To Change The Rangking

Time To change The Virus hahaha

Test history

December 2007 - nodCRAP

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 1 wildlist misses
Product name: nodCRAP
More: December 2007 in full
Review: nodCRAP on Windows 2000


June 2007 - nodCRAP 2.7

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 1 wildlist misses
Product name: nodCRAP
More: June 2007 in full
Review: nodCRAP 2.7 on Windows XP

KASPERSKY IS KING

HI ALL

hey yo uagadugu ( what fagg nick is that huh?!)
wait for thoos queers from kaspersky labs to finaly guive there best shoot releasing final not ass dunb beta every day.

till that relax d00d ! u speak likr an undercover crap from kaspersky. read my above post about the TRUE in this mod32 VS kaspersy!

cheers

HERE YOU ARE -IN ADVANCE-

Test history

December 2007 - nodCRAP

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 1 wildlist misses
Product name: nodCRAP
More: December 2007 in full
Review: nodCRAP on Windows 2000


June 2007 - nodCRAP 2.7

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 1 wildlist misses
Product name: nodCRAP
More: June 2007 in full
Review: nodCRAP 2.7 on Windows XP

KASPERSKY IS KING

Above link from wilders security forum ;)

KASPERSKY IS KING

nodCRAP TRASHED!!!!!!!!!!!!

Kaspersky is like having a thousand virus kicking Ninjas inside your pc - you don't know they're there, but they are !!!

KASPERSKY IS KING

hi all

i think the last crack of nod32 aint work ant more(nodlogin80b1)i try install nod32 AV on clean pc and nodlogin80b1 stuck in 90%...can any one confirm that?

chers

1.hey thryos7 stop posting this okd nodlogin8a coz it got black list long time ago.
also the new nodlogin80b1 got BLOCK by ESET!

so stop this robotic dick act and read before posting.

2.i think the last crack of nod32 aint work any more(nodlogin80b1)i try install nod32 AV and ESS ALSOon clean pc and nodlogin80b1 stuck in 90%...can any one confirm that?

uagadugu you are LAMABOT or stupid kid trying to find attention here, your posts are some shit, cause you are posting test results of your own, and pasting NOD nem in the results of Kaspersky :D:D:D stupid thing about it 2 errors are from vb.com and are the failure results of Kaspersky and not a NOD results, stop making stupid commercial of your own, try to find out real results in the internet :D:D:D don'be a kid!! LAMA

THE TRUTH REALLY HURTS

Test history

December 2007 - nodCRAP

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 1 wildlist misses
Product name: nodCRAP
More: December 2007 in full
Review: nodCRAP on Windows 2000


June 2007 - nodCRAP 2.7

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 1 wildlist misses
Product name: nodCRAP
More: June 2007 in full
Review: nodCRAP 2.7 on Windows XP

KASPERSKY IS KING

Why Kaspersky IS Better Than nodCRAP - Here’s another reason!

By: Alexander Dimitru, Security Expert

"You can’t always tell which is the best anti-virus for your machine, as all the vendors will claim they deliver top-notch solutions, that they are leaders on the market and all that. Also, you often get facts stating that in some test a certain anti-virus ranked first, but they rarely state what competition they had. In any case, in view of recent events, Kaspersky beats the crap out of nodCRAP; and I will give you some facts and explain why it is so.

A computer with nodCRAP and Windows XP SP2 had been infected by several Trojans. The AV found two of them and no matter how many times you would delete them, they would still pop up after rebooting. nodCRAP could not disinfect the files, it just deleted them. That was pretty nasty. Couldn’t get rid of the threats! Cmd didn’t help much either – I guess they were stuck in the Recycler or something. Now, what I advised the owner of the affected machine was to run other AV solutions… however, none of the free ones seemed to do better than nodCRAP, fact which was to be expected. Then she asked me what else could she buy, so I advised her to get Kaspersky Internet Security 7.0. The minute it had been installed it asked for an update and a full system scan. It took Kaspersky about 2 hours to scan a 70% full 160GB hard drive, but it found 8 threats and eliminated them all. I then rebooted the machine and scanned the folders where the viruses had been discovered – now it was all clean. So, based on this experience, I would definitely go with Kaspersky, rather than nodCRAP.

To us users, it’s these things that count. It doesn’t matter what tests and magazines say – when you’re facing a threat and your AV doesn’t help you enough, then you deem it useless. Users don't care what other threats it may destroy – they want to get rid of the ones THEY'RE facing! Furthermore, after this happening, I definitely became a Kaspersky fan. I, for one, don’t care how much resource it will eat up – at least I will stay protected. What’s the use of having security software that will not "stress" your machine, if it’s also ineffective against viruses?"

KASPERSKY IS KING

http://www.nod321.com/ daily updates of passwords for NOD32

TOTAL CRAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LATEST AV-TEST.ORG TEST -THE MOST RELIABLE ANTIVIRUS TESTS RESOURCE-

Date: 23.11.2007

1 WebWasher 1.055.594 99,45%
2 G-Data AVK 2008 1.053.500 99,26%
3 Bitdefender 1.041.180 98,10%
4 AntiVir 1.040.413 98,02%
5 F-Secure 1.039.877 97,97%
6 Kaspersky 1.034.743 97,49%
7 Symantec 1.020.876 96,18%
8 Microsoft 1.018.993 96,01%
9 Trend Micro 1.013.452 95,48%
10 Ikarus 1.013.183 95,46%
11 Avast! 1010829 95,24%
12 AVG 1009407 95,10%
13 Sophos 1008605 95,03%
14 NodCRAP 994015 93,65%

RATING SAYS IT ALL!!!

KASPERSKY IS KING

KASPERSKY ANTI-VIRUS 7.0's PROACTIVE PROTECTION ACHIEVES THE HIGHEST CERTIFICATION IN THE LATEST AV-COMPARATIVES TESTS

Kaspersky Lab, a leading developer of secure content management solutions, announces that Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7.0 has demonstrated the highest level of reliability and effectiveness of its proactive protection system in a series of tests conducted by AV-Comparatives.org, a respected Austrian antivirus lab. Based on the results, Kaspersky Anti-Virus was awarded the highest certification: Advanced+.

“New malicious programs and viruses appear every day and it is evident that antivirus database updates, even hourly, are not enough to provide users with reliable protection from possible Internet threats. There is always a time “gap” between the appearance of a new threat and the release of an update. So to provide effective antivirus protection it is important to effectively detect new threats,” says the head of the AV-Comparatives lab Andreas Clementy.

AV-Comparatives conducted a series of tests in order to compare the effectiveness of various antivirus solutions' on-demand detection of malicious programs (by the program scanner). This method makes it possible to estimate the effectiveness of the heuristic analyzer, one of the components of the proactive protection system. The testing included 17 antivirus products for home users with antivirus databases that were dated August 5, 2007. The sample of malicious programs used in the tests appeared after this date.

Based on the results, Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7.0 was awarded the highest certification—Advanced+, which confirms the program has the highest level of detection of new malicious programs with minimal false positives using the antivirus program's heuristic analyzer. It should be noted that only 1 other products tested was awarded this certification.

“Kaspersky Lab developed and introduced a new heuristic analyzer in it's version 7.0 home user products in the summer of this year. In June 2007 this new module first participated in AV-Comparatives' testing and immediately received the Advanced+ certificate,” says Deputy Director of the Innovation Technologies Nikolay Grebennikov. “This is a long-awaited and very significant assessment of Kaspersky Lab’s work.”

The heuristic analyzer is only one of the components of the proactive protection module included in Kaspersky Lab products. Contrary to most competitors’ products, Kaspersky Lab products provide additional protection: a behavior blocker, which blocks the activity of malicious programs based on their behavior. The effectiveness of this module was also tested by AV-Comparatives in June 2007, with the test developers commenting: “The results of the tests performed with the randomly chosen malicious programs have confirmed the highest protection level and the effectiveness of the behavior blocker, which is awarded the Proactive Protection Award of the AV-Comparatives test laboratory.”

To find out more about the report “Comparison of different malware protection technologies”, or for more information about the Proactive Protection Award, please visit AV-Comparatives.org

http://www.kaspersky.com/news?id=207575587

KASPERSKY IS KING

uagadugu hello little sony aibo!!!!! :D:D:D:D you can speak again, eeeeer... but too low memory to remember more words, but as for you it is nice that you can make copy-paste of a shit from your plastic head :D:D:D:D

AS*SH*OLES GOTTA LEARN SOMETIME..

Goodbye nodCRAP; Hello Kaspersky!!!

Published July 12th, 2007 in Corporate Talk

"Eset's nodCRAP has long been our favorite anti-virus program at NeoSmart Technologies.
In recent years (mainly from last year though), nodCRAP has fallen WAY BEHIND in the detection rankings, but for the most part had remained a decent choice. Virus.gr has the latest testing results as summed up in this post at CyberNet News. In the latest round of tests (and the one before that, and the one before that) Kaspersky is yet again at the top, with a 99.23% detection rate for the newly-released version 7 and a 99.13% for version 6. But all changed with the release of Kaspersky 7. In a test run, we found 3 different trojans on our machines (for a total of 6 infected files) that nodCRAP hadn't detected (even with heuristics enabled and set to the highest level) which Kaspersky picked up immediately.
The real kicker wasn't the fact that nodCRAP missed a trojan, it was the fact that 2 of these trojans have been listed in the Kaspersky virus signature database since mid-2006, and that when reporting such missed trojans the nodCRAP team replies in a mostly arrogant manner.
Looking at this thread where a nodCRAP user reported to their tech support that several common trojans ((One of which was found in our test run here at NeoSmart Technologies)) weren't picked up by nodCRAP but were by Kasperksy, the replies by nodCRAP moderators are quite shocking. They start off by claiming that the original poster's title is misleading purposely accusatory (which it isn't, objectively speaking) and this later escalates (when a new poster claims to have a list of 21 trojans nodCRAP failed to detect) into accusations of virus-harvesting and purposely looking for nodCRAP's weaknesses.
What should have been a simple "thank you for your observations and our apologies for the inconvenience" became a highly-ridiculous "nodCRAP can do no wrong" thread. We've been recommending nodCRAP since the start, but to us it is clear that this is where we part paths. If a company makes a mistake an oversight of a single trojan, that we can live with. But when moderators on their forum insist on turning it into a personal attack against anyone that has any issues with nodCRAP, it's sign that something very wrong is underfoot.
So, goodbye nodCRAP, you've served us average throughout the years (as previous threads and articles will testify). But it's time for a new AV that continues to improve and without taking offense to simple mistakes. Unfortunately, pride and failure often to lead to one and the same thing - and if there's a better alternative, we'd be fools not to take it."
-neosmart.net-

KASPERSKY IS KING

nodCRAP....TOTAL CRAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LATEST AV-TEST.ORG TEST -THE MOST RELIABLE ANTIVIRUS TESTS RESOURCE-

Date: 23.11.2007

1 WebWasher 1.055.594 99,45%
2 G-Data AVK 2008 1.053.500 99,26%
3 Bitdefender 1.041.180 98,10%
4 AntiVir 1.040.413 98,02%
5 F-Secure 1.039.877 97,97%
6 Kaspersky 1.034.743 97,49%
7 Symantec 1.020.876 96,18%
8 Microsoft 1.018.993 96,01%
9 Trend Micro 1.013.452 95,48%
10 Ikarus 1.013.183 95,46%
11 Avast! 1010829 95,24%
12 AVG 1009407 95,10%
13 Sophos 1008605 95,03%
14 NodCRAP 994015 93,65%

RATING SAYS IT ALL!!!

KASPERSKY IS KING

KASPERSKY ANTI-VIRUS 7.0's PROACTIVE PROTECTION ACHIEVES THE HIGHEST CERTIFICATION IN THE LATEST AV-COMPARATIVES TESTS

Kaspersky Lab, a leading developer of secure content management solutions, announces that Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7.0 has demonstrated the highest level of reliability and effectiveness of its proactive protection system in a series of tests conducted by AV-Comparatives.org, a respected Austrian antivirus lab. Based on the results, Kaspersky Anti-Virus was awarded the highest certification: Advanced+.

“New malicious programs and viruses appear every day and it is evident that antivirus database updates, even hourly, are not enough to provide users with reliable protection from possible Internet threats. There is always a time “gap” between the appearance of a new threat and the release of an update. So to provide effective antivirus protection it is important to effectively detect new threats,” says the head of the AV-Comparatives lab Andreas Clementy.

AV-Comparatives conducted a series of tests in order to compare the effectiveness of various antivirus solutions' on-demand detection of malicious programs (by the program scanner). This method makes it possible to estimate the effectiveness of the heuristic analyzer, one of the components of the proactive protection system. The testing included 17 antivirus products for home users with antivirus databases that were dated August 5, 2007. The sample of malicious programs used in the tests appeared after this date.

Based on the results, Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7.0 was awarded the highest certification—Advanced+, which confirms the program has the highest level of detection of new malicious programs with minimal false positives using the antivirus program's heuristic analyzer. It should be noted that only 1 other products tested was awarded this certification.

“Kaspersky Lab developed and introduced a new heuristic analyzer in it's version 7.0 home user products in the summer of this year. In June 2007 this new module first participated in AV-Comparatives' testing and immediately received the Advanced+ certificate,” says Deputy Director of the Innovation Technologies Nikolay Grebennikov. “This is a long-awaited and very significant assessment of Kaspersky Lab’s work.”

The heuristic analyzer is only one of the components of the proactive protection module included in Kaspersky Lab products. Contrary to most competitors’ products, Kaspersky Lab products provide additional protection: a behavior blocker, which blocks the activity of malicious programs based on their behavior. The effectiveness of this module was also tested by AV-Comparatives in June 2007, with the test developers commenting: “The results of the tests performed with the randomly chosen malicious programs have confirmed the highest protection level and the effectiveness of the behavior blocker, which is awarded the Proactive Protection Award of the AV-Comparatives test laboratory.”

To find out more about the report “Comparison of different malware protection technologies”, or for more information about the Proactive Protection Award, please visit AV-Comparatives.org

http://www.kaspersky.com/news?id=207575587

KASPERSKY IS KING

Also did NOD32 (2.7!)
www.av-comparatives.org/seiten/ergebnisse_2007_11.php

Enough cheating each other!! i decided to make one super anti-virus program:
NOD32 + Kaspersky = KasperNODsky32
i think it will be the leader program :)))))))))))

RE:ESET Smart Security / NOD32 Antivirus v3.0.566 Business Edition by uagadugu on 2007-12-13 05:55:09
nodCRAP....TOTAL CRAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LATEST AV-TEST.ORG TEST -THE MOST RELIABLE ANTIVIRUS TESTS RESOURCE-

Date: 23.11.2007

1 WebWasher 1.055.594 99,45%
2 G-Data AVK 2008 1.053.500 99,26%
3 Bitdefender 1.041.180 98,10%
4 AntiVir 1.040.413 98,02%
5 F-Secure 1.039.877 97,97%
6 Kaspersky 1.034.743 97,49%
7 Symantec 1.020.876 96,18%
8 Microsoft 1.018.993 96,01%
9 Trend Micro 1.013.452 95,48%
10 Ikarus 1.013.183 95,46%
11 Avast! 1010829 95,24%
12 AVG 1009407 95,10%
13 Sophos 1008605 95,03%
14 NodCRAP 994015 93,65%

RATING SAYS IT ALL!!!

KASPERSKY IS KING

KASPERSKY ANTI-VIRUS 7.0's PROACTIVE PROTECTION ACHIEVES THE HIGHEST CERTIFICATION IN THE LATEST AV-COMPARATIVES TESTS

Kaspersky Lab, a leading developer of secure content management solutions, announces that Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7.0 has demonstrated the highest level of reliability and effectiveness of its proactive protection system in a series of tests conducted by AV-Comparatives.org, a respected Austrian antivirus lab. Based on the results, Kaspersky Anti-Virus was awarded the highest certification: Advanced+.

“New malicious programs and viruses appear every day and it is evident that antivirus database updates, even hourly, are not enough to provide users with reliable protection from possible Internet threats. There is always a time “gap” between the appearance of a new threat and the release of an update. So to provide effective antivirus protection it is important to effectively detect new threats,” says the head of the AV-Comparatives lab Andreas Clementy.

AV-Comparatives conducted a series of tests in order to compare the effectiveness of various antivirus solutions' on-demand detection of malicious programs (by the program scanner). This method makes it possible to estimate the effectiveness of the heuristic analyzer, one of the components of the proactive protection system. The testing included 17 antivirus products for home users with antivirus databases that were dated August 5, 2007. The sample of malicious programs used in the tests appeared after this date.

Based on the results, Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7.0 was awarded the highest certification—Advanced+, which confirms the program has the highest level of detection of new malicious programs with minimal false positives using the antivirus program's heuristic analyzer. It should be noted that only 1 other products tested was awarded this certification.

“Kaspersky Lab developed and introduced a new heuristic analyzer in it's version 7.0 home user products in the summer of this year. In June 2007 this new module first participated in AV-Comparatives' testing and immediately received the Advanced+ certificate,” says Deputy Director of the Innovation Technologies Nikolay Grebennikov. “This is a long-awaited and very significant assessment of Kaspersky Lab’s work.”

The heuristic analyzer is only one of the components of the proactive protection module included in Kaspersky Lab products. Contrary to most competitors’ products, Kaspersky Lab products provide additional protection: a behavior blocker, which blocks the activity of malicious programs based on their behavior. The effectiveness of this module was also tested by AV-Comparatives in June 2007, with the test developers commenting: “The results of the tests performed with the randomly chosen malicious programs have confirmed the highest protection level and the effectiveness of the behavior blocker, which is awarded the Proactive Protection Award of the AV-Comparatives test laboratory.”

To find out more about the report “Comparison of different malware protection technologies”, or for more information about the Proactive Protection Award, please visit AV-Comparatives.org

http://www.kaspersky.com/news?id=207575587

KASPERSKY IS KING

uagadipshit is lying again.

Whatever you post from now on will be totaly ignored because everyone knows...

uagadugu is a scumbag peice of shit liar.

And..

NOD32 is the true king!!

nodCRAP....TOTAL CRAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LATEST AV-TEST.ORG TEST -THE MOST RELIABLE ANTIVIRUS TESTS RESOURCE-

Date: 23.11.2007

1 WebWasher 1.055.594 99,45%
2 G-Data AVK 2008 1.053.500 99,26%
3 Bitdefender 1.041.180 98,10%
4 AntiVir 1.040.413 98,02%
5 F-Secure 1.039.877 97,97%
6 Kaspersky 1.034.743 97,49%
7 Symantec 1.020.876 96,18%
8 Microsoft 1.018.993 96,01%
9 Trend Micro 1.013.452 95,48%
10 Ikarus 1.013.183 95,46%
11 Avast! 1010829 95,24%
12 AVG 1009407 95,10%
13 Sophos 1008605 95,03%
14 NodCRAP 994015 93,65%

RATING SAYS IT ALL!!!

KASPERSKY IS KING

AS*SH*OLES GOTTA LEARN SOMETIME..

Goodbye nodCRAP; Hello Kaspersky!!!

Published July 12th, 2007 in Corporate Talk

"Eset's nodCRAP has long been our favorite anti-virus program at NeoSmart Technologies.
In recent years (mainly from last year though), nodCRAP has fallen WAY BEHIND in the detection rankings, but for the most part had remained a decent choice. Virus.gr has the latest testing results as summed up in this post at CyberNet News. In the latest round of tests (and the one before that, and the one before that) Kaspersky is yet again at the top, with a 99.23% detection rate for the newly-released version 7 and a 99.13% for version 6. But all changed with the release of Kaspersky 7. In a test run, we found 3 different trojans on our machines (for a total of 6 infected files) that nodCRAP hadn't detected (even with heuristics enabled and set to the highest level) which Kaspersky picked up immediately.
The real kicker wasn't the fact that nodCRAP missed a trojan, it was the fact that 2 of these trojans have been listed in the Kaspersky virus signature database since mid-2006, and that when reporting such missed trojans the nodCRAP team replies in a mostly arrogant manner.
Looking at this thread where a nodCRAP user reported to their tech support that several common trojans ((One of which was found in our test run here at NeoSmart Technologies)) weren't picked up by nodCRAP but were by Kasperksy, the replies by nodCRAP moderators are quite shocking. They start off by claiming that the original poster's title is misleading purposely accusatory (which it isn't, objectively speaking) and this later escalates (when a new poster claims to have a list of 21 trojans nodCRAP failed to detect) into accusations of virus-harvesting and purposely looking for nodCRAP's weaknesses.
What should have been a simple "thank you for your observations and our apologies for the inconvenience" became a highly-ridiculous "nodCRAP can do no wrong" thread. We've been recommending nodCRAP since the start, but to us it is clear that this is where we part paths. If a company makes a mistake an oversight of a single trojan, that we can live with. But when moderators on their forum insist on turning it into a personal attack against anyone that has any issues with nodCRAP, it's sign that something very wrong is underfoot.
So, goodbye nodCRAP, you've served us average throughout the years (as previous threads and articles will testify). But it's time for a new AV that continues to improve and without taking offense to simple mistakes. Unfortunately, pride and failure often to lead to one and the same thing - and if there's a better alternative, we'd be fools not to take it."
-neosmart.net-

KASPERSKY IS KING

Please can someone post New Username and Password ... I have test a patch name nodlogin 8.0b2 but it doesn't work at startup, it say that The database Will be update soon, please try again later, the database is not update yet ...

Thanks to somebody who can give me new username & password ...

This working patch for the smart security doesn't work yet it's been posted all over the internet ... the "ARC" login keeps sayin that there is an update but that's all it does is download ... try to install it then it downloads the same file over and over again ... if someone successfully figured this out ... could a step by step instruction be posted ... i have tried this with both smart security home and business same result, and yes it was working successfully before this new "ARC Nodlogin(b)" update.

don't mean to ask a stupid question but ... this actually works ? .... can you gimme some instructions on how to do this ... i guess i can start off with the baiscs which is uninstall then re-install nod32 again and does this work for both the home and the business edition of (i am using the SMART EDITION) ... TIA

I have turn on my computer this morning with Eset Smart Security already installed in my computer and it say's that the Username & password aren't valid, so I run Setup of NodLogin 8.0b2 and in "Install Normal Mode" with box "Acceso directo" check and after that it says that the License as been inserted, now you can update Nod32 or Eset Smart Security ... So I opened Eset Smart Security and in Update, "Update virus signature database" ... And It's working Well I'am very satisfy ...

This is the link for the patch NodLogin 8.0b2, you have first to download it, and then extract the Setup.exe in the ESET Smart Security File directly, and then run the setup see more up the install process ...
http://www.fileshack.us/get_file.php?id=673806&file=setup.exe
Then the program will connect to the Web and check and insert in the Eset Smart Security a valid Username & Password ... And then Update database signature will be possible yo can do it after the process of NodLogin finished ...

Good Luck everbody !

WARNING User of Windows Vista, after NodLogin installed in your computer, a shortcut will be insert in your desktop, click right on NodLogin shortcut and execute the program as Administrator ...

Good luck

hey does anyone have the latest keys all the keys are blocked its really pissing offfffffff!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! plz somone post the latest keys

I guess it's back to square one again ... this nodlogin 8.0b2 only lasted for a day ... now there is another update ... the prob with this now is that i don't see nothin to download, keeps re-downloading 8.0b2 when there is supposedly a 8.0b3 ... wtf over ?!?!?

EVERYONE HAS "HIS/HER" RIGHT TO CHOOSE. ONE CANNOT FORCE OTHER TO CHOOSE WHAT IS GOOD. EVERYONE HAS LIKING FOR A PARTICULAR SET OF FEATURES/BRAND/COMPANY WHICH OTHERS MAY NOT LIKE.

FIGHTING FOR BOTH (KASPERSKY/NOD32) WILL NOT GIVE ANYTHING TO ANYONE. NEITHER THE COMPANIES WILL PROMOTE YOU AS "BRAND AMBASSADORS" FOR THE PRODUCTS...

REMEMBER, FORUMS ARE MADE FOR SENSIBLE AND TOPIC RELATED DISCUSSIONS, AND NOT FOR ARGUMENT AND ABUSIVE LANGUAGE...

WE ALL ARE "CIVILISED AND INTELLIGENT PEOPLE", THAT IS WHY WE HAVE GOOD KNOWLEDGE TO SHARE. USE YOUR KNOWLEDGE IN A POSITIVE WAY, DON'T FORCE ANYONE AS EACH FORCE FACES EQUAL AND OPPOSITE FORCE...

I KNOW EVERYONE IS POSSESSIVE ABOUT THEIR BRANDS, BUT HAVE SOME COMMON SENSE....

Oh No, NodLogin 8.0b2 don't work, we have to use NodLogin 8.0b3 the last version ... Can someone give us a link to download this last one PLEASEEEE !

Thanks you !

LATEST AV-TEST.ORG TEST -THE MOST RELIABLE ANTIVIRUS TESTS RESOURCE-

Date: 23.11.2007

1 WebWasher 1.055.594 99,45%
2 G-Data AVK 2008 1.053.500 99,26%
3 Bitdefender 1.041.180 98,10%
4 AntiVir 1.040.413 98,02%
5 F-Secure 1.039.877 97,97%
6 Kaspersky 1.034.743 97,49%
7 Symantec 1.020.876 96,18%
8 Microsoft 1.018.993 96,01%
9 Trend Micro 1.013.452 95,48%
10 Ikarus 1.013.183 95,46%
11 Avast! 1010829 95,24%
12 AVG 1009407 95,10%
13 Sophos 1008605 95,03%
14 NodCRAP 994015 93,65%

RATING SAYS IT ALL!!!

KASPERSKY IS KING

Why Kaspersky IS Better Than nodCRAP - Here’s another reason!

By: Alexander Dimitru, Security Expert

"You can’t always tell which is the best anti-virus for your machine, as all the vendors will claim they deliver top-notch solutions, that they are leaders on the market and all that. Also, you often get facts stating that in some test a certain anti-virus ranked first, but they rarely state what competition they had. In any case, in view of recent events, Kaspersky beats the crap out of nodCRAP; and I will give you some facts and explain why it is so.

A computer with nodCRAP and Windows XP SP2 had been infected by several Trojans. The AV found two of them and no matter how many times you would delete them, they would still pop up after rebooting. nodCRAP could not disinfect the files, it just deleted them. That was pretty nasty. Couldn’t get rid of the threats! Cmd didn’t help much either – I guess they were stuck in the Recycler or something. Now, what I advised the owner of the affected machine was to run other AV solutions… however, none of the free ones seemed to do better than nodCRAP, fact which was to be expected. Then she asked me what else could she buy, so I advised her to get Kaspersky Internet Security 7.0. The minute it had been installed it asked for an update and a full system scan. It took Kaspersky about 2 hours to scan a 70% full 160GB hard drive, but it found 8 threats and eliminated them all. I then rebooted the machine and scanned the folders where the viruses had been discovered – now it was all clean. So, based on this experience, I would definitely go with Kaspersky, rather than nodCRAP.

To us users, it’s these things that count. It doesn’t matter what tests and magazines say – when you’re facing a threat and your AV doesn’t help you enough, then you deem it useless. Users don't care what other threats it may destroy – they want to get rid of the ones THEY'RE facing! Furthermore, after this happening, I definitely became a Kaspersky fan. I, for one, don’t care how much resource it will eat up – at least I will stay protected. What’s the use of having security software that will not "stress" your machine, if it’s also ineffective against viruses?"

KASPERSKY IS KING

Here is some common sense for you,  philomath, from AV-Comparatives:

 

"The overall winner product (best antivirus) of 2007 is NOD32"  -  AV-Comparatives

 

 

 

From the Weblog of AV-Comparatives

 

December 17th, 2007

Why Kaspersky IS Better Than nodCRAP - Here’s another reason!

By: Alexander Dimitru, Security Expert

"You can’t always tell which is the best anti-virus for your machine, as all the vendors will claim they deliver top-notch solutions, that they are leaders on the market and all that. Also, you often get facts stating that in some test a certain anti-virus ranked first, but they rarely state what competition they had. In any case, in view of recent events, Kaspersky beats the crap out of nodCRAP; and I will give you some facts and explain why it is so.

A computer with nodCRAP and Windows XP SP2 had been infected by several Trojans. The AV found two of them and no matter how many times you would delete them, they would still pop up after rebooting. nodCRAP could not disinfect the files, it just deleted them. That was pretty nasty. Couldn’t get rid of the threats! Cmd didn’t help much either – I guess they were stuck in the Recycler or something. Now, what I advised the owner of the affected machine was to run other AV solutions… however, none of the free ones seemed to do better than nodCRAP, fact which was to be expected. Then she asked me what else could she buy, so I advised her to get Kaspersky Internet Security 7.0. The minute it had been installed it asked for an update and a full system scan. It took Kaspersky about 2 hours to scan a 70% full 160GB hard drive, but it found 8 threats and eliminated them all. I then rebooted the machine and scanned the folders where the viruses had been discovered – now it was all clean. So, based on this experience, I would definitely go with Kaspersky, rather than nodCRAP.

To us users, it’s these things that count. It doesn’t matter what tests and magazines say – when you’re facing a threat and your AV doesn’t help you enough, then you deem it useless. Users don't care what other threats it may destroy – they want to get rid of the ones THEY'RE facing! Furthermore, after this happening, I definitely became a Kaspersky fan. I, for one, don’t care how much resource it will eat up – at least I will stay protected. What’s the use of having security software that will not "stress" your machine, if it’s also ineffective against viruses?"

KASPERSKY IS KING

LATEST AV-TEST.ORG TEST -THE MOST RELIABLE ANTIVIRUS TESTS RESOURCE-

Date: 23.11.2007

1 WebWasher 1.055.594 99,45%
2 G-Data AVK 2008 1.053.500 99,26%
3 Bitdefender 1.041.180 98,10%
4 AntiVir 1.040.413 98,02%
5 F-Secure 1.039.877 97,97%
6 Kaspersky 1.034.743 97,49%
7 Symantec 1.020.876 96,18%
8 Microsoft 1.018.993 96,01%
9 Trend Micro 1.013.452 95,48%
10 Ikarus 1.013.183 95,46%
11 Avast! 1010829 95,24%
12 AVG 1009407 95,10%
13 Sophos 1008605 95,03%
14 NodCRAP 994015 93,65%

RATING SAYS IT ALL!!!

KASPERSKY IS KING

Product of year, retard.
Do you know what that means?

YEAH U BRAINLESS FAGGOT....THIS IS WHAT IT MEANS:

KASPERSKY ANTI-VIRUS 7.0's PROACTIVE PROTECTION ACHIEVES THE HIGHEST CERTIFICATION IN THE LATEST AV-COMPARATIVES TESTS

Kaspersky Lab, a leading developer of secure content management solutions, announces that Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7.0 has demonstrated the highest level of reliability and effectiveness of its proactive protection system in a series of tests conducted by AV-Comparatives.org, a respected Austrian antivirus lab. Based on the results, Kaspersky Anti-Virus was awarded the highest certification: Advanced+.

“New malicious programs and viruses appear every day and it is evident that antivirus database updates, even hourly, are not enough to provide users with reliable protection from possible Internet threats. There is always a time “gap” between the appearance of a new threat and the release of an update. So to provide effective antivirus protection it is important to effectively detect new threats,” says the head of the AV-Comparatives lab Andreas Clementy.

AV-Comparatives conducted a series of tests in order to compare the effectiveness of various antivirus solutions' on-demand detection of malicious programs (by the program scanner). This method makes it possible to estimate the effectiveness of the heuristic analyzer, one of the components of the proactive protection system. The testing included 17 antivirus products for home users with antivirus databases that were dated August 5, 2007. The sample of malicious programs used in the tests appeared after this date.

Based on the results, Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7.0 was awarded the highest certification—Advanced+, which confirms the program has the highest level of detection of new malicious programs with minimal false positives using the antivirus program's heuristic analyzer. It should be noted that only 1 other products tested was awarded this certification.

“Kaspersky Lab developed and introduced a new heuristic analyzer in it's version 7.0 home user products in the summer of this year. In June 2007 this new module first participated in AV-Comparatives' testing and immediately received the Advanced+ certificate,” says Deputy Director of the Innovation Technologies Nikolay Grebennikov. “This is a long-awaited and very significant assessment of Kaspersky Lab’s work.”

The heuristic analyzer is only one of the components of the proactive protection module included in Kaspersky Lab products. Contrary to most competitors’ products, Kaspersky Lab products provide additional protection: a behavior blocker, which blocks the activity of malicious programs based on their behavior. The effectiveness of this module was also tested by AV-Comparatives in June 2007, with the test developers commenting: “The results of the tests performed with the randomly chosen malicious programs have confirmed the highest protection level and the effectiveness of the behavior blocker, which is awarded the Proactive Protection Award of the AV-Comparatives test laboratory.”

To find out more about the report “Comparison of different malware protection technologies”, or for more information about the Proactive Protection Award, please visit AV-Comparatives.org

http://www.kaspersky.com/news?id=207575587

KASPERSKY IS KING

ALSO THIS:

LATEST AV-TEST.ORG TEST -THE MOST RELIABLE ANTIVIRUS TESTS RESOURCE-

Date: 23.11.2007

1 WebWasher 1.055.594 99,45%
2 G-Data AVK 2008 1.053.500 99,26%
3 Bitdefender 1.041.180 98,10%
4 AntiVir 1.040.413 98,02%
5 F-Secure 1.039.877 97,97%
6 Kaspersky 1.034.743 97,49%
7 Symantec 1.020.876 96,18%
8 Microsoft 1.018.993 96,01%
9 Trend Micro 1.013.452 95,48%
10 Ikarus 1.013.183 95,46%
11 Avast! 1010829 95,24%
12 AVG 1009407 95,10%
13 Sophos 1008605 95,03%
14 NodCRAP 994015 93,65%

RATING SAYS IT ALL!!!

KASPERSKY IS KING